z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Development and Measurement of Guidelines-Based Quality Indicators of Caesarean Section Care in the Netherlands: A RAND-Modified Delphi Procedure and Retrospective Medical Chart Review
Author(s) -
Sonja Melman,
Ellen C. N. Schoorel,
Karin Boer,
Henriëtte Burggraaf,
Jan Derks,
Det van Dijk,
Jeroen van Dillen,
Carmen D. Dirksen,
Johannes J. Duvekot,
Arie Franx,
Tom H.M. Hasaart,
Anjoke Huisjes,
Diny G.E. Kolkman,
Sander M. J. van Kuijk,
Anneke Kwee,
Ben W. Mol,
Maria G. van Pampus,
Alieke de Roon-Immerzeel,
J.J.M. van Roosmalen,
Frans J.M.E. Roumen,
Ellen Smid-Koopman,
Luc Smits,
Wilbert Spaans,
Harry Visser,
Wim J. van Wijngaarden,
Christine Willekes,
Maurice G.A.J. Wouters,
Jan G. Nijhuis,
Rosella Hermens,
Hubertina Scheepers
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
plos one
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.99
H-Index - 332
ISSN - 1932-6203
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pone.0145771
Subject(s) - medicine , caesarean section , guideline , delphi method , quality management , vaginal delivery , family medicine , obstetrics , emergency medicine , medical emergency , pregnancy , operations management , management system , statistics , genetics , mathematics , pathology , economics , biology
Background There is an ongoing discussion on the rising CS rate worldwide. Suboptimal guideline adherence may be an important contributor to this rise. Before improvement of care can be established, optimal CS care in different settings has to be defined. This study aimed to develop and measure quality indicators to determine guideline adherence and identify target groups for improvement of care with direct effect on caesarean section (CS) rates. Method Eighteen obstetricians and midwives participated in an expert panel for systematic CS quality indicator development according to the RAND-modified Delphi method. A multi-center study was performed and medical charts of 1024 women with a CS and a stratified and weighted randomly selected group of 1036 women with a vaginal delivery were analysed. Quality indicator frequency and adherence were scored in 2060 women with a CS or vaginal delivery. Results The expert panel developed 16 indicators on planned CS and 11 indicators on unplanned CS. Indicator adherence was calculated, defined as the number of women in a specific obstetrical situation in which care was performed as recommended in both planned and unplanned CS settings. The most frequently occurring obstetrical situations with low indicator adherence were: 1) suspected fetal distress (frequency 17%, adherence 46%), 2) non-progressive labour (frequency 12%, CS performed too early in over 75%), 3) continuous support during labour (frequency 88%, adherence 37%) and 4) previous CS (frequency 12%), with adequate counselling in 15%. Conclusions We identified four concrete target groups for improvement of obstetrical care, which can be used as a starting point to reduce CS rates worldwide.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom