It’s Not Easy Being Blue: Are There Olfactory and Visual Trade-Offs in Plant Signalling?
Author(s) -
Kim Valenta,
Kevin A. Brown,
Amanda Melin,
Spencer K. Monckton,
Sarah A. Styler,
Derek A. Jackson,
Colin A. Chapman
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
plos one
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.99
H-Index - 332
ISSN - 1932-6203
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pone.0131725
Subject(s) - extant taxon , biology , context (archaeology) , seed dispersal , sensory system , sensory cue , biological dispersal , frugivore , signalling , botany , evolutionary biology , ecology , neuroscience , habitat , microbiology and biotechnology , paleontology , population , demography , sociology
Understanding the signals used by plants to attract seed disperses is a pervasive quest in evolutionary and sensory biology. Fruit size, colour, and odour variation have long been discussed in the controversial context of dispersal syndromes targeting olfactory-oriented versus visually-oriented foragers. Trade-offs in signal investment could impose important physiological constraints on plants, yet have been largely ignored. Here, we measure the reflectance and volatile organic compounds of a community of Malagasy plants and our results indicate that extant plant signals may represent a trade-off between olfactory and chromatic signals. Blue pigments are the most visually-effective – blue is a colour that is visually salient to all known seed dispersing animals within the study system. Additionally, plants with blue-reflecting fruits are less odiferous than plants that reflect primarily in other regions of the colour spectrum.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom