The Association between Dietary Energy Density and Type 2 Diabetes in Europe: Results from the EPIC-InterAct Study
Author(s) -
Saskia W. van den Berg,
Daphne L. van der A,
Annemieke M. W. Spijkerman,
Geertruida J. van Woudenbergh,
Mariken Tijhuis,
Pilar Amiano,
Eva Ardanáz,
Joline W. J. Beulens,
H. Boeing,
Françoise Clavel-Chapelon,
Francesca L. Crowe,
Blandine de LauzonGuillain,
Guy Fagherazzi,
Paul W. Franks,
Heinz Freisling,
Carlos A. González,
Sara Grioni,
Jytte Halkjær,
José María Huerta,
Inge Huybrechts,
Rudolf Kaaks,
Kay Tee Khaw,
Giovanna Masala,
Peter M. Nilsson,
Kim Overvad,
Salvatore Panico,
J. Ramón Quirós,
Olov Rolandsson,
Carlotta Sacerdote,
MaríaJosé Sánchez,
Matthias B. Schulze,
Nadia Slimani,
Ellen A. Struijk,
Anne Tjønneland,
Rosario Tumino,
Stephen J. Sharp,
Claudia Langenberg,
Nita G. Forouhi,
Edith J. M. Feskens,
Elio Ríboli,
Nicholas J. Wareham
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
plos one
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.99
H-Index - 332
ISSN - 1932-6203
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pone.0059947
Subject(s) - european prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition , medicine , type 2 diabetes , hazard ratio , prospective cohort study , cohort study , proportional hazards model , obesity , environmental health , demography , cohort , lower risk , diabetes mellitus , confidence interval , endocrinology , sociology
Background Observational studies implicate higher dietary energy density (DED) as a potential risk factor for weight gain and obesity. It has been hypothesized that DED may also be associated with risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D), but limited evidence exists. Therefore, we investigated the association between DED and risk of T2D in a large prospective study with heterogeneity of dietary intake. Methodology/Principal Findings A case-cohort study was nested within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer (EPIC) study of 340,234 participants contributing 3.99 million person years of follow-up, identifying 12,403 incident diabetes cases and a random subcohort of 16,835 individuals from 8 European countries. DED was calculated as energy (kcal) from foods (except beverages) divided by the weight (gram) of foods estimated from dietary questionnaires. Prentice-weighted Cox proportional hazard regression models were fitted by country. Risk estimates were pooled by random effects meta-analysis and heterogeneity was evaluated. Estimated mean (sd) DED was 1.5 (0.3) kcal/g among cases and subcohort members, varying across countries (range 1.4–1.7 kcal/g). After adjustment for age, sex, smoking, physical activity, alcohol intake, energy intake from beverages and misreporting of dietary intake, no association was observed between DED and T2D (HR 1.02 (95% CI: 0.93–1.13), which was consistent across countries ( I 2 = 2.9%). Conclusions/Significance In this large European case-cohort study no association between DED of solid and semi-solid foods and risk of T2D was observed. However, despite the fact that there currently is no conclusive evidence for an association between DED and T2DM risk, choosing low energy dense foods should be promoted as they support current WHO recommendations to prevent chronic diseases.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom