z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
HURP Expression-Assisted Risk Scores Identify Prognosis Distinguishable Subgroups in Early Stage Liver Cancer
Author(s) -
MingLing Chang,
ShiMing Lin,
ChauTing Yeh
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
plos one
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.99
H-Index - 332
ISSN - 1932-6203
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pone.0026323
Subject(s) - medicine , hepatocellular carcinoma , proportional hazards model , hepatectomy , hazard ratio , gastroenterology , immunohistochemistry , cancer , liver cancer , survival analysis , stage (stratigraphy) , multivariate analysis , oncology , pathology , urology , resection , surgery , biology , confidence interval , paleontology
Background Hepatoma up-regulated protein (HURP) is a component of the chromatin-dependent pathway for spindle assembly. We examined the prognostic predictive value of HURP in human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods HURP expression was evaluated by immunocytochemistry of fine needle aspirated hepatoma cells in 97 HCC patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage A. Subsequently, these patients underwent partial hepatectomy (n = 18) or radiofrequency ablation (n = 79) and were followed for 2 to 35 months. The clinicopathological parameters were submitted for survival analysis. Results HURP expression in aspirated HCC cells was detected in 19.6% patients. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that positive HURP expression ( P  = 0.023), cytological grading ≥3 ( P  = 0.008), AFP ≥35 ng/mL ( P  = 0.039), bilirubin ≥1.3 mg/dL ( P  = 0.010), AST ≥50 U/L ( P  = 0.003) and ALT ≥35 U/L ( P  = 0.005) were all associated with a shorter disease-free survival. A stepwise multivariate Cox proportional hazard model revealed that positive HURP expression (HR, 2.334; 95% CI, 1.165–4.679, P  = 0.017), AST ≥50 U/L (HR, 3.697; 95% CI, 1.868–7.319, p <0.001), cytological grade ≥3 (HR, 4.249; 95% CI, 2.061–8.759, P <0.001) and tumor number >1 (HR, 2.633; 95% CI, 1.212–5.722, P  = 0.014) were independent predictors for disease-free survival. By combining the 4 independent predictors, patients with different risk scores (RS) showed distinguishable disease-free survival (RS≤1 vs. RS = 2, P  = 0.001; RS = 2 vs. RS = 3, P<0.001). In contrast, the patients cannot be separated into prognosis distinguishable subgroups by using AJCC/UICC TNM staging system. Conclusion HCC patients with BCLC stage A can be separated into three prognosis-distinguishable groups by use of a risk score that is based upon HURP expression in aspirated HCC cells, ALT, cytological grade and tumor number.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom