z-logo
HomeZAIABlog
open-access-imgOpen Access
Many Reviews Are Systematic but Some Are More Transparent and Completely Reported than Others
Author(s) -
PLoS Medicine Editors
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
plos medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.847
H-Index - 228
eISSN - 1549-1676
pISSN - 1549-1277
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040147
Subject(s) - systematic review , medicine , medline , biology , biochemistry
The implications for PLoS Medicine and other journals of new research, published in this issue, showing that there are major variations in the reporting quality of systematic reviews.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom

About

AboutCareersPublisher PartnersContact UsOur institutional solutionsGet Organisational Trial or Quote

Learn

FAQsBlogTerms of UsePrivacy Policy

Download the Zendy App

Get it on
Google Play
Download on the
App Store

Discover

Explore

Copyright Knowledge E © 2026. All Rights Reserved.