Relative Burden of Large CNVs on a Range of Neurodevelopmental Phenotypes
Author(s) -
Santhosh Girirajan,
Zoran Brkanac,
Bradley P. Coe,
Carl Baker,
Laura Vives,
Tiffany Vu,
Neil Shafer,
Raphael Bernier,
Giovanni Battista Ferrero,
Margherita Silengo,
Stephen T. Warren,
Carlos S. Moreno,
Marco Fichera,
Corrado Romano,
Wendy H. Raskind,
Evan E. Eichler
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
plos genetics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.587
H-Index - 233
eISSN - 1553-7404
pISSN - 1553-7390
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002334
Subject(s) - odds ratio , autism , intellectual disability , dyslexia , copy number variation , biology , genetics , autism spectrum disorder , phenotype , neurodevelopmental disorder , odds , medicine , psychiatry , gene , genome , logistic regression , reading (process) , political science , law
While numerous studies have implicated copy number variants (CNVs) in a range of neurological phenotypes, the impact relative to disease severity has been difficult to ascertain due to small sample sizes, lack of phenotypic details, and heterogeneity in platforms used for discovery. Using a customized microarray enriched for genomic hotspots, we assayed for large CNVs among 1,227 individuals with various neurological deficits including dyslexia (376), sporadic autism (350), and intellectual disability (ID) (501), as well as 337 controls. We show that the frequency of large CNVs (>1 Mbp) is significantly greater for ID–associated phenotypes compared to autism (p = 9.58×10 −11 , odds ratio = 4.59), dyslexia (p = 3.81×10 −18 , odds ratio = 14.45), or controls (p = 2.75×10 −17 , odds ratio = 13.71). There is a striking difference in the frequency of rare CNVs (>50 kbp) in autism (10%, p = 2.4×10 −6 , odds ratio = 6) or ID (16%, p = 3.55×10 −12 , odds ratio = 10) compared to dyslexia (2%) with essentially no difference in large CNV burden among dyslexia patients compared to controls. Rare CNVs were more likely to arise de novo (64%) in ID when compared to autism (40%) or dyslexia (0%). We observed a significantly increased large CNV burden in individuals with ID and multiple congenital anomalies (MCA) compared to ID alone (p = 0.001, odds ratio = 2.54). Our data suggest that large CNV burden positively correlates with the severity of childhood disability: ID with MCA being most severely affected and dyslexics being indistinguishable from controls. When autism without ID was considered separately, the increase in CNV burden was modest compared to controls (p = 0.07, odds ratio = 2.33).
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom