Mutational Patterns Cannot Explain Genome Composition: Are There Any Neutral Sites in the Genomes of Bacteria?
Author(s) -
Eduardo P. C. Rocha,
Edward J. Feil
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
plos genetics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.587
H-Index - 233
eISSN - 1553-7404
pISSN - 1553-7390
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001104
Subject(s) - gc content , biology , genome , genetics , codon usage bias , natural selection , genome size , genome evolution , evolutionary biology , neutral mutation , genetic variation , selection (genetic algorithm) , gene , artificial intelligence , computer science
International audienceThe dissection of natural selection and neutral processes remains a core problem for molecular evolutionary biologists. One of the longest-standing controversies con- cerns the causes of genome base compo- sition, notably the variation in the sum of G and C content (GC) between 17% and 75% in bacteria. Sueoka argued very early that GC content variation is driven by mutational biases and, as this bias affects non-synonymous sites, protein evolution might also be largely driven by neutral forces [1]. Later, Muto and Osawa showed that 4-fold degenerate positions in codons exhibit the largest range of GC content (GC4), whereas the non-degener- ate second codon positions (GC2) exhibit the narrowest (Figure 1) [2]. As the footprint of genomic GC variation is most evident in those sites under the least selective constraint for amino acid com- position, it has become accepted that GC content variation is primarily driven by neutral mutational effects and has little adaptive relevance [2]
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom