z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Mutational Patterns Cannot Explain Genome Composition: Are There Any Neutral Sites in the Genomes of Bacteria?
Author(s) -
Eduardo P. C. Rocha,
Edward J. Feil
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
plos genetics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.587
H-Index - 233
eISSN - 1553-7404
pISSN - 1553-7390
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001104
Subject(s) - gc content , biology , genome , genetics , codon usage bias , natural selection , genome size , genome evolution , evolutionary biology , neutral mutation , genetic variation , selection (genetic algorithm) , gene , artificial intelligence , computer science
International audienceThe dissection of natural selection and neutral processes remains a core problem for molecular evolutionary biologists. One of the longest-standing controversies con- cerns the causes of genome base compo- sition, notably the variation in the sum of G and C content (GC) between 17% and 75% in bacteria. Sueoka argued very early that GC content variation is driven by mutational biases and, as this bias affects non-synonymous sites, protein evolution might also be largely driven by neutral forces [1]. Later, Muto and Osawa showed that 4-fold degenerate positions in codons exhibit the largest range of GC content (GC4), whereas the non-degener- ate second codon positions (GC2) exhibit the narrowest (Figure 1) [2]. As the footprint of genomic GC variation is most evident in those sites under the least selective constraint for amino acid com- position, it has become accepted that GC content variation is primarily driven by neutral mutational effects and has little adaptive relevance [2]

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom