Is a Mass Immunization Program for Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 Good Value for Money? Early Evidence from the Canadian Experience.
Author(s) -
Beate Sander,
Chris T. Bauch,
David N. Fisman,
R Fowler,
Jeffrey C. Kwong,
Allison McGeer,
Marija Zivkovic Gojovic,
Murray Krahn
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
plos currents
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.282
H-Index - 49
ISSN - 2157-3999
DOI - 10.1371/currents.rrn1137
Subject(s) - pandemic , immunization , h1n1 pandemic , medicine , immunization program , population , outbreak , covid-19 , environmental health , demography , medical emergency , virology , immunology , disease , pathology , antigen , sociology , infectious disease (medical specialty)
This work contributes informed estimates to the current debate about the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 mass immunization program’s economic merits. We performed a cost-utility analysis of the (H1N1) 2009 mass immunization program in Ontario, Canada’s most populous province. The analysis is based on a simulation model of a pandemic (H1N1) 2009 outbreak, surveillance data, and administrative data. We consider no immunization versus mass immunization reaching 30% of the population. Immunization program costs are expected to be $118 million in Ontario. Our analysis indicates this program will reduce influenza cases by 50%, preventing 35 deaths, and cutting treatment costs in half. A pandemic (H1N1) 2009 immunization program is likely to be highly cost-effective.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom