Identity and the Visual Arts Curriculum in Colonial and Postcolonial Hong Kong
Author(s) -
Ma So Mui
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
visual arts research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2151-8009
pISSN - 0736-0770
DOI - 10.1353/var.2010.0005
Subject(s) - identity (music) , colonialism , curriculum , the arts , visual arts , visual arts education , gender studies , sociology , pedagogy , history , art , aesthetics , archaeology
This essay examines identity politics reflected in primary and secondary school art curricula before and after the reunification of Hong Kong with China in 1997. Strategies used by the previous British colonial government and the current Chinese government to control the local people and to maintain harmony among them are compared. As early as 1967, the British promoted the inclusion of Chinese art in the art curriculum, presumably to avoid conflict with China. After the return of Hong Kong to China in 1997, the local Hong Kong government emphasized the need to increase the Chinese content in the visual arts curriculum, though no noticeable effort was made to translate this value into action. From the colonial years to the present day, art from cultures other than the West and China has been limited, and local art has been consistently marginalized. This practice reveals that both colonial and the postcolonial governments in Hong Kong have used the same politics of control.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom