z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Aesthetic Experience and Music Education
Author(s) -
Pentti Määttänen
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
philosophy of music education review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.107
H-Index - 2
eISSN - 1543-3412
pISSN - 1063-5734
DOI - 10.1353/pme.2003.0005
Subject(s) - music education , psychology , aesthetics , music psychology , musicology , pedagogy , visual arts , music and emotion , music , sociology , art
Bennett Reimer presents quite explicitly the guiding principles that he has followed in writing his book on the philosophy of music education: “It will be necessary to identify an aesthetic position which includes major thinkers and which also has an identifiable structure of ideas which can be handled without being overwhelming in complexity.”1 Reimer has certainly succeeded in writing an easily comprehensible book about philosophy of music education, but the attempt to avoid complexity may be dangerous in discussing philosophical issues. The notion of aesthetic experience, or at least its biological or “natural” basis (quotes by Reimer), is claimed to be “very strongly based on the thought of John Dewey and Susanne K. Langer.”2 From this the reader might conclude that Reimer’s notion of aesthetic experience has something to do with John Dewey’s corresponding notion, but this is not, strictly speaking, the case. Reimer has taken one feature from Dewey who frequently discusses the role of emotions in aesthetic experience and man as a living creature in his Art as Experience. The rest of Dewey’s philosophy is, however, simply ignored. The philosophical frameworks of Reimer and Dewey are completely different. Heidi

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom