z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Heads in Oceanic Indirect Possession
Author(s) -
Bill Palmer,
Dunstan Brown
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
oceanic linguistics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.177
H-Index - 17
eISSN - 1527-9421
pISSN - 0029-8115
DOI - 10.1353/ol.2007.0022
Subject(s) - possessive , possession (linguistics) , computer science , noun phrase , linguistics , syntax , search engine indexing , noun , genitive case , phrase , head (geology) , natural language processing , artificial intelligence , philosophy , biology , paleontology
In many Oceanic languages the "indirect" possessive construction, which is typically associated with alienable possession, uses special forms to host person and number agreement indexing the possessor. This can be contrasted with the "direct" possessive construction, typically associated with inalienable possession, where a lexical possessum noun itself carries possessor-indexing agreement. The host forms used in the indirect construction are often referred to as "classifiers." We argue that this term should not be applied to indirect possession marking in many Oceanic languages, and present evidence to show that indirect possessor-indexing hosts in such languages do not have the properties typically associated with classifiers. In contrast with this, we further argue that these indirect possessor-indexing hosts should be treated as the syntactic head of the noun phrase in which they occur, thereby allowing treatment of the syntax of NPs with indirect possession that is consistent with those with direct marking. In both instances, the person and number indexing morphology simply attaches to the syntactic head.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom