The Cracked Foundations of the Right to Secede
Author(s) -
Donald L. Horowitz
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
journal of democracy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.58
H-Index - 86
eISSN - 1086-3214
pISSN - 1045-5736
DOI - 10.1353/jod.2003.0033
Subject(s) - secession , ethnic group , successor cardinal , political economy , political science , state (computer science) , self determination , law , ethnic conflict , partition (number theory) , sociology , sovereignty , politics , mathematical analysis , mathematics , algorithm , computer science , combinatorics
Reinterpreting the principle of self-determination, some theorists have proposed that victimized ethnic groups ought to have a right to secede from states in which they are located. Proponents of such a right assert that, by separating antagonistic groups, secession can alleviate ethnic conflict. Secession, however, does not create homogeneous successor states or assure protection of remaining minorities, and its converts domestic ethnic conflict into more dangerous international conflict. Recognition of a right to secede would dampen attempts to adopt conciliatory policies in the undivided state, and would likely increase ultimately fruitless secessionist warfare. The best hope for severely divided societies lies not in encouraging secession or partition but in devising institutions to increase the satisfaction of minorities in existing states.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom