Swann Song: Antibiotic Regulation in British Livestock Production (1953–2006)
Author(s) -
Claas Kirchhelle
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
bulletin of the history of medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.201
H-Index - 31
eISSN - 1086-3176
pISSN - 0007-5140
DOI - 10.1353/bhm.2018.0029
Subject(s) - livestock , antibiotic resistance , consumption (sociology) , dilemma , environmental ethics , animal husbandry , resistance (ecology) , antibiotics , political science , animal production , ambivalence , production (economics) , agriculture , microbiology and biotechnology , political economy , biology , sociology , economics , social science , ecology , psychology , philosophy , social psychology , zoology , macroeconomics , epistemology
Antibiotics have played a significant yet ambivalent role in Western livestock husbandry. Mass introduced to agriculture to boost animal production and reduce feed consumption in the early 1950s, agricultural antibiotics were soon accused of selecting for bacterial resistance, causing residues and enabling bad animal welfare. The dilemma posed by agricultural antibiotic regulation persists to this day. This essay traces the history of British antibiotic regulation from 1953 to the influential 1969 Swann report. It highlights the role that individual experts using bacteriophage typing played in warning about the mass selection for bacterial resistance on farms and the response of a corporatist system, whose traditional laissez-faire arrangements struggled to cope with the risk posed by bacterial resistance. In addition to contextualizing the Swann report's origins, the essay also discusses the report's fate and implications for current antibiotic regulation.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom