z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
From Foetid Air to Filth: The Cultural Transformation of British Epidemiological Thought, ca. 1780–1848
Author(s) -
Michael F. Brown
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
bulletin of the history of medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.201
H-Index - 31
eISSN - 1086-3176
pISSN - 0007-5140
DOI - 10.1353/bhm.0.0070
Subject(s) - plague (disease) , disgust , faith , history , agency (philosophy) , dirt , sociology , environmental ethics , psychology , philosophy , social science , epistemology , geography , social psychology , ancient history , cartography , anger
Eighteenth-and early nineteenth-century ideas about the occurrence and spread of epidemic disease were complex and contested. Although many thought that diseases such as plague, typhus, and cholera were contagious and were communicated from person to person or via the medium of goods, others believed that they were the product of atmospheric change. Moreover, as historians have emphasized, the early nineteenth century saw a move from a multifactoral, climatic etiology toward one that prioritized specific local corruption of the atmosphere caused by putrefying animal and vegetable matter. In this paper, I extend this analysis by linking to recent literature on dirt and disgust and exploring the importance of theologies. I examine the work of two key figures in the history of British epidemiology, Charles Maclean and Thomas Southwood Smith, and demonstrate how the latter's increasing emphasis upon the causal agency of filth was structured by his Unitarian faith and his belief in a universally benevolent God.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom