Writing Philippine History of Ideas and Fernando Amorsolo's Modern Art
Author(s) -
Jovino Miroy
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
kritika kultura
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.13
H-Index - 5
eISSN - 2094-6937
pISSN - 1656-152X
DOI - 10.13185/kk2011.01706
Subject(s) - intersubjectivity , subjectivity , individualism , subject (documents) , painting , object (grammar) , philosophy of history , intellectual history , modern history , sociology , comprehension , social history (medicine) , aesthetics , literature , history , art history , epistemology , art , philosophy , social science , law , linguistics , political science , medicine , surgery , archaeology , library science , computer science , economic history
Writing Philippine history of ideas requires that we problematize the discipline of intellectual history itself. Rethinking of itself vis-a-vis cultural and social history, Philippine history of ideas would no longer rehearse the development of philosophy in the Philippines, but also of art, religion, etc. The paper discusses how Amorsolo may be considered a modern painter. Amorsolo’s art eludes comprehension because his notion of subjectivity as well as intersubjectivity transgresses the Cartesian break between subject and object. As a modern painter, he positioned himself as an individualist, but was still able to communicate to his culture.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom