A Genealogy of State Crime in International Law: Contrasting Criminological Perspectives
Author(s) -
Camilo Umaña
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
state crime journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.237
H-Index - 3
eISSN - 2046-6064
pISSN - 2046-6056
DOI - 10.13169/statecrime.10.2.0304
Subject(s) - criminal law , impossibility , law , state responsibility , state (computer science) , international law , political science , criminology , public international law , sociology , computer science , algorithm
In international public law, the concept of state crime has been extensively debated. For some international law commentators “[t]he concept of state responsibility for international crimes is juridically feasible and may be analyzed in terms of a criminal organization model or a corporate crime model” (Jørgensen 2000: 280); to others, “[t]he criminal state is juridically speaking a nonsense . . . The punishability of the state is both a legal and a practical impossibility.” (Drost 1959: 304). Although currently common legal understanding represents this notion as alien to the legal tradition, this term has a relevant place in the historical debates and development of international law. This paper discusses international law developments in contrast to criminological reflections relating to state crime, drawing attention to possible cross-references between these disciplines.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom