Evaluation of the Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T) in Children With Tetraplegia
Author(s) -
Kathryn Dent,
Namrata Grampurohit,
Christina Calhoun Thielen,
Cristina Sadowsky,
Loren Davidson,
Heather B. Taylor,
Jackie Bultman,
John Gaughan,
Ralph J. Marino,
M.J. Mulcahey
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.597
H-Index - 35
eISSN - 1945-5763
pISSN - 1082-0744
DOI - 10.1310/sci2403-239
Subject(s) - medicine , tetraplegia , concurrent validity , physical therapy , discriminant validity , physical medicine and rehabilitation , spinal cord injury , intraclass correlation , internal consistency , test (biology) , spinal cord , psychometrics , clinical psychology , psychiatry , paleontology , biology
Background: The Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T) is a spinal cord injury (SCI)-specific instrument based on the CUE Questionnaire (CUE-Q). Objective: To evaluate the psychometric properties of CUE-T in children with cervical SCI and determine the lowest age appropriate for test administration. Method: In this repeated measures multicenter study, 39 youths, mean age 12.3 years and mean time post injury 5.14 years, completed two administrations of the CUE-T. Test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and known groups validity were measured. Concurrent and discriminant validity were measured against previously validated measures: CUE-Q, Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP), Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) III, SCIM III-Self Care (SCIM-SC), and SCIM-Mobility. Results: The CUE-T scores demonstrated strong test-retest reliability (ICC ≥ 0.95), strong internal consistency (α ≥ 0.90), and acceptable individual item agreement (κ ≥ 0.49). The hand subscale had better scores ( p < .05) for the motor incomplete versus complete known groups, and the arm, hand, and side subscales had better scores ( p < .05) for higher versus lower strength groups. The CUE-T had strong concurrent validity with the CUE-Q ( r = 0.85-0.87), GRASSP ( r = 0.78-0.90), and SCIM-SC ( r = 0.70) and moderate-to-weak correlation with the total SCIM ( r = 0.65) and SCIM-Mobility ( r = 0.51). Children older than 6 years with mature grasp patterns were able to complete the CUE-T. Conclusion: The CUE-T scores are reliable and valid for use in children with cervical SCI older than 6 years of age.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom