z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Evaluation of the Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T) in Children With Tetraplegia
Author(s) -
Kathryn Dent,
Namrata Grampurohit,
Christina Calhoun Thielen,
Cristina Sadowsky,
Loren Davidson,
Heather B. Taylor,
Jackie Bultman,
John Gaughan,
Ralph J. Marino,
M.J. Mulcahey
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.597
H-Index - 35
eISSN - 1945-5763
pISSN - 1082-0744
DOI - 10.1310/sci2403-239
Subject(s) - medicine , tetraplegia , concurrent validity , physical therapy , discriminant validity , physical medicine and rehabilitation , spinal cord injury , intraclass correlation , internal consistency , test (biology) , spinal cord , psychometrics , clinical psychology , psychiatry , paleontology , biology
Background: The Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T) is a spinal cord injury (SCI)-specific instrument based on the CUE Questionnaire (CUE-Q). Objective: To evaluate the psychometric properties of CUE-T in children with cervical SCI and determine the lowest age appropriate for test administration. Method: In this repeated measures multicenter study, 39 youths, mean age 12.3 years and mean time post injury 5.14 years, completed two administrations of the CUE-T. Test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and known groups validity were measured. Concurrent and discriminant validity were measured against previously validated measures: CUE-Q, Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP), Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) III, SCIM III-Self Care (SCIM-SC), and SCIM-Mobility. Results: The CUE-T scores demonstrated strong test-retest reliability (ICC ≥ 0.95), strong internal consistency (α ≥ 0.90), and acceptable individual item agreement (κ ≥ 0.49). The hand subscale had better scores ( p < .05) for the motor incomplete versus complete known groups, and the arm, hand, and side subscales had better scores ( p < .05) for higher versus lower strength groups. The CUE-T had strong concurrent validity with the CUE-Q ( r = 0.85-0.87), GRASSP ( r = 0.78-0.90), and SCIM-SC ( r = 0.70) and moderate-to-weak correlation with the total SCIM ( r = 0.65) and SCIM-Mobility ( r = 0.51). Children older than 6 years with mature grasp patterns were able to complete the CUE-T. Conclusion: The CUE-T scores are reliable and valid for use in children with cervical SCI older than 6 years of age.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom