English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background: The Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T) and the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP) were both developed to detect change in upper extremity (UE) function in persons with tetraplegia. Objective: To compare the responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the CUE-T and the quantitative prehension (QtP) scale of the GRASSP. Methods: Subjects included 69 persons with tetraplegia: 60 with acute and 9 with chronic injuries. Subjects were assessed twice 3 months apart using the CUE-T, QtP-GRASSP, and upper extremity motor scores (UEMS). Subjects rated their impression of change in overall and right/left UE function from -7 to +7. The standardized response mean (SRM) was determined for acute subjects. MCID was estimated using a small subjective change (2-3 points) and change in UEMS. Results: Subjects were 41.9 ± 18.1 years old, neurological levels C1-C7; 25 were motor complete. For acute subjects, the SRMs for total/side CUE-T scores were 1.07/0.96, and for the QtP-GRASSP they were 0.88/0.78. MCIDs based on subjective change for total/side CUE-T scores were 11.7/6.1 points and for QtP-GRASSP were 6.4/3.0 points. Based on change in UEMS, MCIDs for total/side were 11.9/6.3 points for CUE-T and 6.0/3.3 points for QtP-GRASSP. Some subjects had changes in the CUE-T due to its arm items that were not seen with the QtP-GRASSP. Conclusion: Both the CUE-T and QtP-GRASSP are responsive to change in persons with acute cervical spinal cord injury with large SRMs. The CUE-T detects some changes in UE function not seen with the QtP-GRASSP.

topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation

Comparison of Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T) and the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP)