Ergative diagnostics: temptatio redux
Author(s) -
Werner Abraham
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
linguistik online
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 1615-3014
DOI - 10.13092/lo.13.868
Subject(s) - ergative case , linguistics , valency , argument (complex analysis) , german , object (grammar) , subject (documents) , class (philosophy) , dative case , computer science , history , mathematics , philosophy , artificial intelligence , transitive relation , biochemistry , chemistry , combinatorics , library science
In the past 20 years, a new class of verbs has seen the light of existence: 'unaccu- sative' or 'ergative' verbs. These verbs are intransitive, but different from the tra- ditional notion of intransitive to the extent that their subject valency behaves like a direct object distributionally. Ever since the introduction of this new gram- matical notion in (typologically non-ergative, i. e., accusative) languages like English a vast bulk of literature on this topic has come forth. The present article takes issue with this mainly Anglophil notion of unaccusativity/ergativity. The claim is that this notion does not make sense in languages which provide aspec- tual or aktionsart distinctions of perfectivity. 'Unaccusatives' are intransitive per- fectives. This argument is carried through primarily on the empirical basis of German.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom