English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Accurate estimation of disease extent and margin status is critical when evaluating partial mastectomy cases because both are predictors of recurrence. No published standards exist for processing specimens involved by invasive carcinoma, presumably because such cases have a gross lesion. We retrospectively studied 100 partial mastectomy cases and concluded that a standardized tissue mapping protocol is needed to ensure adequate pathologic examination even when a gross lesion is present. When mapped and unmapped findings were compared, 17 cases (10 with ductal and 7 with lobular carcinoma) had an increase in carcinoma size, 12 cases (9 with ductal and 3 with lobular carcinoma) had an increase in pathologic T stage, and positive margins were found in 8 cases (7 with ductal and 1 with lobular carcinoma). We describe our tissue-mapping protocol, and advocate its use as a standardized protocol for processing all partial mastectomy specimens.

Quantifying the Extent of Invasive Carcinoma and Margin Status in Partial Mastectomy Cases Having a Gross Lesion