Economic analysis of row cover insect exclusion for cucurbit crops
Author(s) -
H. Mark Hanna,
Danielle N. Polk,
Kurt A. Rosentrater,
Brian L. Steward
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
2015 asabe international meeting
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
DOI - 10.13031/aim.20162461363
Subject(s) - acre , sprayer , toxicology , yield (engineering) , polyethylene , crop , environmental science , agricultural engineering , mathematics , pulp and paper industry , agronomy , biology , agricultural science , engineering , materials science , composite material
Cucurbit crops are vulnerable to fungal infections spread by insects which act as a disease vector. Excluding insects by covering rows of cucurbit crops in a low tunnel structure offers an alternative to insecticide application. Differences in costs for using spunbond polypropylene (e.g. Agribon) or polyethylene mesh (e.g. Proteknet) as row covers were compared with a conventional chemical application strategy. Costs of materials, machinery, and insecticide were calculated for ten years of operation on 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, 2, or 4 ha (0.5, 1, 2, 5, or 10 acres). The total costs of the spunbond polypropylene system were $1620/ha to $5290/ha ($650/acre to $2140/ acre) greater than the conventional system depending on operational size. Smaller production areas were more costly due to machinery costs. The polyethylene mesh system was $1500/ha ($600/acre) more costly than using spunbond polypropylene due to material costs. A truck-mounted sprayer became more cost effective than a backpack sprayer as operational size increased beyond 0.8 ha (2 acre). The increased costs of the row cover strategy will need to be off-set by increased yield or value of the cucurbit crop (i.e. organic sales).
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom