z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
BONE LENGTHENING
Author(s) -
F. G. Allan
Publication year - 1948
Publication title -
journal of bone and joint surgery - british volume
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 0968-7300
pISSN - 0301-620X
DOI - 10.1302/0301-620x.30b3.490
Subject(s) - femur , medicine , tibia , traction (geology) , fibula , periosteum , external fixator , surgery , intramedullary rod , osteotomy , orthodontics , geology , geomorphology
1. Two inches of lengthening may be gained in the femur, and three inches in the tibia and fibula, without complication. 2. More than this may be secured at the risk of temporary external popliteal paresis. 3. Lengthening of the tibia and fibula is more certain and more easy to control than lengthening of the femur. 4. Traction, and counter-traction through the bone, with complete lateral rigidity, are essential to success. 5. In applying this technique to the femur there is a danger of knee stiffness. The farther from the knee the skeletal traction pins are inserted, the less is the risk. The operation should therefore be planned as high as possible in the shaft of the femur. 6. The most delicate structure, and the one least tolerant of stretching, is the external popliteal nerve. 7. An oblique osteotomy, started by closely spaced drill-holes, is the best. 8. Certain vascular complications experienced by other surgeons are attributable to subperiosteal bone exposure, and to dividing the periosteum and fascial structures transversely.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom