Advancing Alternative Analysis: Integration of Decision Science
Author(s) -
Timothy Malloy,
Virginia Zaunbrecher,
Christina Batteate,
Ann Blake,
William F. Carroll,
Charles J. Corbett,
Steffen Foss Hansen,
Robert J. Lempert,
Igor Linkov,
Roger McFadden,
Kelly D. Moran,
Elsa Olivetti,
Nancy K. Ostrom,
Michelle Romero,
Julie M. Schoenung,
Thomas P. Seager,
Peter Sinsheimer,
Kristina A. Thayer
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
environmental health perspectives
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.257
H-Index - 282
eISSN - 1552-9924
pISSN - 0091-6765
DOI - 10.1289/ehp483
Subject(s) - decision analysis , government (linguistics) , outreach , management science , regulatory science , decision engineering , business decision mapping , decision support system , decision maker , risk analysis (engineering) , computer science , engineering ethics , engineering , political science , business , medicine , artificial intelligence , economics , linguistics , philosophy , mathematical economics , pathology , law
Background: Decision analysis—a systematic approach to solving complex problems—offers tools and frameworks to support decision making that are increasingly being applied to environmental challenges. Alternatives analysis is a method used in regulation and product design to identify, compare, and evaluate the safety and viability of potential substitutes for hazardous chemicals. Objectives: Assess whether decision science may assist the alternatives analysis decision maker in comparing alternatives across a range of metrics. Methods: A workshop was convened that included representatives from government, academia, business, and civil society and included experts in toxicology, decision science, alternatives assessment, engineering, and law and policy. Participants were divided into two groups and prompted with targeted questions. Throughout the workshop, the groups periodically came together in plenary sessions to reflect on other groups’ findings. Discussion: We conclude the further incorporation of decision science into alternatives analysis would advance the ability of companies and regulators to select alternatives to harmful ingredients, and would also advance the science of decision analysis. Conclusions: We advance four recommendations: (1) engaging the systematic development and evaluation of decision approaches and tools; (2) using case studies to advance the integration of decision analysis into alternatives analysis; (3) supporting transdisciplinary research; and (4) supporting education and outreach efforts..National Science Foundation (U.S.) ((NSF DBI-0830117)National Science Foundation (U.S.) (NSF DBI-1266377)United States. Environmental Protection Agenc
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom