The role of aluminum and age-dependent decline.
Author(s) -
Johan Bjorksten
Publication year - 1989
Publication title -
environmental health perspectives
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.257
H-Index - 282
eISSN - 1552-9924
pISSN - 0091-6765
DOI - 10.1289/ehp.8981241
Subject(s) - license , download , library science , gerontology , political science , medicine , psychology , computer science , world wide web , law
You are to be congratulated on publishing the very thought-provoking article by P. 0. Ganrot, entitled "Metabolism and Possible Health Effects of Aluminum" (1). After reviewing a substantial part of the extensive literature, Ganrot analyzes it carefully and shows that an element of the properties of aluminum will indeed prejudice normal function if it reaches sensitive parts of the organism. His Table 1 points to the conclusion that only aluminum has all the qualifications for long-term destructive action. Only aluminum and beryllium have an ionic diameter small enough to ensure easy access and penetration. Although beryllium is a fast-acting poison, it could not at all cause the long-term chronic effects of aluminum. A world in which beryllium, instead of aluminum, constituted 8.4% of its surface, could only sustain bacteria, and at the very most some exceptionally fast-breeding fleas might have evolved. Chromium is the only metal listed by Ganrot, which is nearly, but not quite, as versatile a cross-linking agent as is aluminum, with zirconium a runner up. However, the chromium atom has too large a radius to occupy a calcium site, and above all, the cell metabolism can escape chromium by changing the ambient so as to reduce trivalent chromium to its innocuous bivalent form. Aluminum is the only one of the metals mentioned that is always trivalent. None of the metals with multiple valences needs to be considered as a stand-in for aluminum. They can all escape an awkward metabolic situation by being switched to a lower valence. That this escape option is actually used is evidence in the case of chromium by the findings of Markesbery et al. (2). Chromium increases slowly but steadily up to the persons that died in the range of 40 to 60 years, but then makes a sharp dip, as if a corrective or escape measure had been taken. Aluminum shows no such dip (Fig. 1). This same course is evidenced by Zinsser et al. (3). This paper shows the aluminum levels of 14 aortas from necropsies in the age group up to 40 years and 13 aortas in the age group 41 to 50. The latter group shows an increase in aluminum of 2.72 times. Chromium analyses were made from analogous age groups, 10 aortas from a group up to 40 and 6 from 41 to 50. These analyses showed a decrease of 29.9% in the chromium content at death. After age 50, the sharply increasing mortality rate from cancer, heart disease, and other causes obscured the results. The analyses were made by emission spectrography at Columbia University, New York, NY, where the late H. H. Zinsser, Jr., was professor of urology. On page 400 of Ganrot's article, he concludes, "In summary, Al3 + clearly has caused DOM [dialysis osteomalacia], but on a molecular level, the pathogenic mechanisms are completely unknown." This surprising statement become understandable when I recalled that Ganrot's bibliography with 959 references did not go back far enough to include Staudinger and Heuer (4) and Staudinger and Husemann (5). The basic papers proved that as little as 0.01% of a typical cross-linking agent could change a soluble linear polymer to a 99% insoluble aggregate. (Staudinger received the 1953 Nobel Prize in chemistry.) Cross-linking is the process by which the smallest input can cause the greatest possible change. Ganrot's estimate of the lethal quantities of aluminum is incorrect. In the tanning industry, to which Ganrot refers, the quantities of aluminum used are thousands of times larger than what would be fatal in a human brain because a) industry required speed in interest of economy. Therefore, it uses large excesses of tanning (cross-
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom