z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The advantages and limitations of an in vivo test system for investigating the cytotoxicity and fibrogenicity of fibrous dusts.
Author(s) -
S. E. Sykes,
A. Morgan,
S. R. Moores,
Wilburt C. Davison,
Jörn D. Beck,
Andrew Holmes
Publication year - 1983
Publication title -
environmental health perspectives
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.257
H-Index - 282
eISSN - 1552-9924
pISSN - 0091-6765
DOI - 10.1289/ehp.8351267
Subject(s) - chrysotile , in vivo , lung , pathology , medicine , chemistry , asbestos , biology , materials science , microbiology and biotechnology , metallurgy
The acute response of the rat lung to a range of fibrous materials has been investigated by bronchopulmonary lavage, at dose levels of 0.5 and 1.0 mg, 1 and 7 days after their administration by intratracheal instillation. The materials chosen for study included UICC chrysotile A, amosite, crocidolite and anthophyllite, and samples of S. African "long" amosite and glass fiber. In addition, the subacute response to 1, 2 and 3 mg of chrysotile and amosite has been studied at 50 and 100 days after instillation. In the acute phase at 1 day after instillation, the response to chrysotile was greater than that to any of the other materials, but by 7 days there was no gradation in the response to different dusts. In the subacute phase, cell recoveries were low, and it was not possible to assess the long-term cytotoxic or fibrogenic effects of amosite and chrysotile by analyses of lung washes, even though biochemical and histological methods indicated gross changes in lung pathology.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom