z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Optimal Exposure Biomarkers for Nonpersistent Chemicals in Environmental Epidemiology
Author(s) -
Antonia M. Calafat,
Matthew P. Longnecker,
Holger M. Koch,
Shanna H. Swan,
Russ Hauser,
Lynn R. Goldman,
Bruce P. Lanphear,
Ruthann A. Rudel,
Stephanie M. Engel,
Susan L. Teitelbaum,
Robin M. Whyatt,
Mary S. Wolff
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
environmental health perspectives
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.257
H-Index - 282
eISSN - 1552-9924
pISSN - 0091-6765
DOI - 10.1289/ehp.1510041
Subject(s) - biomonitoring , biomarker , toxicology , environmental chemistry , biology , chemistry , biochemistry
We discuss considerations that are essential when evaluating exposure to nonpersistent, semivolatile environmental chemicals such as phthalates and phenols (e.g., bisphenol A). A biomarker should be chosen to best represent usual personal exposures and not recent, adventitious, or extraneous exposures. Biomarkers should be selected to minimize contamination arising from collection, sampling, or analysis procedures. Pharmacokinetics should be considered; for example, nonpersistent, semivolatile chemicals are metabolized quickly, and urine is the compartment with the highest concentrations of metabolites. Because these chemicals are nonpersistent, knowledge of intraindividual reliability over the biologic window of interest is also required. In recent years researchers have increasingly used blood as a matrix for characterizing exposure to nonpersistent chemicals. However, the biologic and technical factors noted above strongly support urine as the optimal matrix for measuring nonpersistent, semivolatile, hydrophilic environmental agents.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom