z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Consistency and Inconsistency Between the Fundamental Relationships on Which Different Traffic Assignment Models Are Based
Author(s) -
Malachy Carey,
Paul Humphreys,
Marie McHugh,
Ronan McIvor
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
transportation science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.965
H-Index - 115
eISSN - 1526-5447
pISSN - 0041-1655
DOI - 10.1287/trsc.2017.0809
Subject(s) - consistency (knowledge bases) , computer science , transport engineering , operations research , econometrics , engineering , mathematics , artificial intelligence
We compare the forms and properties of different macroscopic behavioral relationships on which different static and dynamic traffic assignment models have been based, namely, travel time-flow functions, travel time-occupancy functions, and flow-occupancy functions or flow-density functions. Given any one of these three relationships we can derive the other two, so that they appear mathematically equivalent. These three behavioral relationships focus on different variables, but they are meant to be observing the same traffic and are not meant to be inconsistent or incompatible with each other. However, we see that the forms and properties usually assumed for any one of these three relationships are often inconsistent or incompatible with the forms or properties that are usually assumed for the other two, or that are considered acceptable for the other two. It might be thought that any inconsistencies between these relationships are because of modeling different phenomena, however that does not explain some...

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom