Crowdvoting Judgment: An Analysis of Modern Peer Review | Zendy

Michael R. Wagner | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Crowdvoting Judgment: An Analysis of Modern Peer Review

Author(s) -

Michael R. Wagner

Publication year - 2020

Publication title -

stochastic systems

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

ISSN - 1946-5238

DOI - 10.1287/stsy.2019.0053

Subject(s) - voting , aggregate (composite) , computer science , limit (mathematics) , service (business) , quality (philosophy) , majority rule , focus (optics) , simple (philosophy) , attrition , microeconomics , artificial intelligence , economics , business , marketing , mathematics , political science , medicine , mathematical analysis , philosophy , materials science , physics , optics , epistemology , dentistry , politics , law , composite material

In this paper, we propose and analyze models of self policing in online communities, in which assessment activities, typically handled by firm employees, are shifted to the “crowd.” Our underlying ...

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research