data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c3fd/2c3fd2c05ec175716150fd2054ac6d9c19b5c66f" alt="open-access-img"
Note—Naive Diversification and Portfolio Risk—A Note
Author(s) -
Ron Bird,
Mark Tippett
Publication year - 1986
Publication title -
management science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.954
H-Index - 255
eISSN - 1526-5501
pISSN - 0025-1909
DOI - 10.1287/mnsc.32.2.244
Subject(s) - diversification (marketing strategy) , portfolio , portfolio optimization , econometrics , standard deviation , post modern portfolio theory , modern portfolio theory , economics , parametric statistics , computer science , actuarial science , mathematics , replicating portfolio , financial economics , statistics , business , marketing
A number of authors have used the portfolio standard deviation to model the risk reduction advantages of naive diversification. Other authors have pointed out that when risk is modelled by the portfolio's variance the modelling process becomes much simpler and is computationally more efficient. In this note we derive an exact parametric relationship between portfolio standard deviation and size and thus highlight the dangers of using the standard deviation in conjunction with O.L.S. regression techniques to model the risk reduction advantages of naive diversification. It is then shown that past empirical studies which have used this methodology are deficient.portfolio, standard deviation, variance, naive diversification