Hormonal Contraceptives Do Not Impact Economic Preferences: Evidence from a Randomized Trial
Author(s) -
Eva Ranehill,
Niklas Zethraeus,
Liselott Blomberg,
Bo von Schoultz,
Angelica Lindén Hirschberg,
Magnus Johannesson,
Anna Dreber
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
management science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.954
H-Index - 255
eISSN - 1526-5501
pISSN - 0025-1909
DOI - 10.1287/mnsc.2017.2844
Subject(s) - affect (linguistics) , placebo , altruism (biology) , psychology , demography , developed country , economics , social psychology , medicine , population , environmental health , alternative medicine , communication , pathology , sociology
A growing body of correlational studies suggests that sex hormones such as those contained in, or affected by, oral contraceptives (OCs) may impact economic behavior. However, despite widespread use of OCs among women in Western countries, little is known about their potential behavioral effects. The present study investigates whether OCs causally influence economic preferences. We randomly allocate 340 women aged 18–35 to three months of a widely used OC or placebo treatment. At the end of treatment, we conduct an economic experiment measuring altruism, financial risk taking, and willingness to compete. The statistical power is 80% to detect an effect size equal to a Cohen’s d of 0.30 at the 5% level. We find no significant effects of OCs on any of the measured preferences, indicating that this widely used OC treatment, commonly used throughout the world, does not significantly affect the measured economic preferences. Further, we find no relation between menstrual cycle phase and economic preferences in...
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom