Bias and the Commitment to Disclosure
Author(s) -
Mirko Stanislav Heinle,
Robert E. Verrecchia
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
management science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.954
H-Index - 255
eISSN - 1526-5501
pISSN - 0025-1909
DOI - 10.1287/mnsc.2015.2283
Subject(s) - commit , cash , cash flow , negative correlation , positive correlation , business , correlation , inside information , empirical evidence , monetary economics , econometrics , economics , accounting , microeconomics , financial economics , finance , computer science , medicine , philosophy , geometry , mathematics , epistemology , database
This paper studies the propensity of firms to commit to disclose information that is subsequently biased, in the presence of other firms also issuing potentially biased information. An important aspect of such an analysis is the fact that firms can choose whether to disclose or withhold information. We show that allowing the number of disclosed reports to be endogenous introduces a countervailing force to some of the empirical predictions from the prior literature. For example, we find that as more firms issue reports or as the correlation across firmsu0027 cash flows increases, the firm biases its report less. However, when we treat firmsu0027 disclosure choices as endogenous, we show that the number of firms that commit to disclose decreases as the correlation across these cash flows increases, and this, in turn, offsets the direct effect of the correlation on bias.This paper was accepted by Mary Barth, accounting.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom