A Comparison of Milestone-Based and Buyout Options Contracts for Coordinating R&D Partnerships
Author(s) -
Shantanu Bhattacharya,
Vibha Gaba,
Sameer Hasija
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
management science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.954
H-Index - 255
eISSN - 1526-5501
pISSN - 0025-1909
DOI - 10.1287/mnsc.2013.1874
Subject(s) - milestone , moral hazard , outcome (game theory) , investment (military) , business , microeconomics , general partnership , bargaining power , incentive , risk aversion (psychology) , schedule , actuarial science , finance , industrial organization , economics , financial economics , expected utility hypothesis , management , archaeology , politics , political science , law , history
We analyze optimal contractual arrangements in a bilateral research and development (R&D) partnership between a risk-averse provider that conducts early-stage research followed by a regulatory verification stage and a risk-neutral client that performs late-stage development activities, including production, distribution, and marketing. The problem is formulated as a sequential investment game with the client as the principal, where the investments are observable but not verifiable. The model captures the inherent incentive alignment problems of double-sided moral hazard, risk aversion, and holdup. We compare the efficacy of milestone-based options contracts and buyout options contracts from the client's perspective and identify conditions under which they attain the first-best outcome for the client. We find that milestone-based options contracts always attain the first-best outcome for the client when the provider has some bargaining power in renegotiation and identify their applicability to different R&...
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom