Comment: Using Product Profiling to Illustrate Manufacturing-Marketing Misalignment
Author(s) -
Richard J. Schonberger
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
informs journal on applied analytics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.662
H-Index - 64
eISSN - 1526-551X
pISSN - 0092-2102
DOI - 10.1287/inte.29.6.127
Subject(s) - wonder , marketing , product (mathematics) , product line , profiling (computer programming) , business , correctness , computer science , engineering , manufacturing engineering , mathematics , psychology , social psychology , geometry , operating system , programming language
In teir July August 1998 article, Hill, Menda, and Dilts described Rumack Pharmaceutical Company (disguised name) as an example of misalignment between marketing and manufacturing. The problem was that marketing had stretched the product line beyond manufacturings capacity limits. The authors stated that operations managers took an action that would seem unwise or contrary to accepted practice in many of todays manufacturing organizations. Rumack decided to increase production lot sizes by an average of 100 percent [p. 61].The authors were respectful (appropriately, in view of Rumacks open door to their research) of the deliberations that resulted in this decision. Many readers, though, will probably wonder, as I do, about the correctness of the decision, considering the widely held impression that lot sizes should fall, not rise.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom