z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The Evaluation of Research Papers (Or How to Get an Academic Committee to Agree on Something)
Author(s) -
Matthew J. Liberatore,
Robert L. Nydick,
Peter M. Sánchez
Publication year - 1992
Publication title -
informs journal on applied analytics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.662
H-Index - 64
eISSN - 1526-551X
pISSN - 0092-2102
DOI - 10.1287/inte.22.2.92
Subject(s) - process (computing) , selection (genetic algorithm) , analytic hierarchy process , hierarchy , operations research , computer science , management science , engineering management , public relations , management , political science , psychology , engineering , economics , artificial intelligence , law , operating system

The College of Commerce and Finance at Villanova University sponsors an annual research awards program. Its objectives are to encourage and reward faculty research efforts. The process of selecting papers to win the award turned out to be far more complex than we initially expected. After many unsuccessful attempts at developing a manageable procedure, we used the analytic hierarchy process to structure the selection process. We have used this approach for the last three years without any serious problems. The faculty and external advisors using the system believe that it can better capture the subjective judgments of the evaluators than any of the previous approaches.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom