The Ombudsman: Are Top Executives Paid Enough? An Evidence-Based Review
Author(s) -
Philippe Jacquart,
J. Scott Armstrong
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
informs journal on applied analytics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.662
H-Index - 64
eISSN - 1526-551X
pISSN - 0092-2102
DOI - 10.1287/inte.2013.0705
Subject(s) - business
Our review of the evidence found that the notion that higher pay leads to the selection of better executives is undermined by the prevalence of poor recruiting methods. Moreover, higher pay fails to promote better performance. Instead, it undermines the intrinsic motivation of executives, inhibits their learning, leads them to ignore other stakeholders, and discourages them from considering the long-term effects of their decisions on stakeholders. Relating incentive payments to executives' actions in an effective manner is not possible. Incentives also encourage unethical behavior. Organizations would benefit from using validated methods to hire top executives, reducing compensation, eliminating incentive plans, and strengthening stockholder governance related to the hiring and compensation of executives.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom