Rejoinder—Genetic Algorithms: No Panacea, but a Valuable Tool for the Operations Researcher
Author(s) -
Colin R. Reeves
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
informs journal on computing
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.403
H-Index - 80
eISSN - 1526-5528
pISSN - 1091-9856
DOI - 10.1287/ijoc.9.3.263
Subject(s) - panacea (medicine) , computer science , thread (computing) , feature (linguistics) , algorithm , operations research , programming language , mathematics , philosophy , medicine , linguistics , alternative medicine , pathology
When I was invited to contribute this feature article, I did not realize quite how much work I was taking on! Thus, I am naturally pleased that the commentators all found something useful and interesting as a result of my labors, and I would like to thank them for their comments. There is a clear common thread running through the remarks of all of them—the question of how to decide what genetic algorithms (GAs) can do, or alternatively, the related question of how to make them do it better. Focusing on this question was one of my aims in writing the feature article, so the way they have picked this up and added their own insights is very helpful.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom