z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
From the Editor
Author(s) -
Bruce L. Golden
Publication year - 1992
Publication title -
informs journal on computing
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2326-3245
pISSN - 0899-1499
DOI - 10.1287/ijoc.4.3.225
Subject(s) - computer science
I recently read “Actual Pacemaker Longevity: The Benefit of Stimulation by Automatic Capture Verification” (ACV) in the July 2010 issue of PACE.1 The manuscript reveals that control patients’ pacemakers were left at out-of-the-box 3.5-V atrial and ventricular outputs. In our center and many others, leaving pulse generators at manufacturer’s settings is neither standard nor recommended practice. For example, we have used leads with steroid-eluting iridium-oxide electrodes for over 15 years, and at the time of subsequent pulse generator replacement 6to >10year postimplant, voltage thresholds for both atrial and ventricular capture have typically been ≤0.6 V at pulse widths of 0.4 ms. Although occasionally indicated, very few of our over 1,000 patients are programmed to higher than 2.5-V outputs, and settings of ≤2.0 V (as low as 1.5 V in nondependent

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom