z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Cognitive function and its associations in older adults from Amazonas, Brazil
Author(s) -
Maria Antonieta Tinôco,
Élvio Rúbio Gouveia,
Andreas Ihle,
Matthias Kliegel,
Jefferson Jurema,
Floramara T. Machado,
Angeany Pinto Odim,
Bárbara R. Muniz,
Euler Esteves Ribeiro,
Bruna R. Gouveia,
Duarte Freitas
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
revista brasileira de atividade física and saúde
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2317-1634
pISSN - 1413-3482
DOI - 10.12820/rbafs.23e0013
Subject(s) - geriatric depression scale , socioeconomic status , quality of life (healthcare) , depression (economics) , medicine , cognition , gerontology , linear regression , psychology , demography , depressive symptoms , psychiatry , population , nursing , environmental health , machine learning , sociology , computer science , economics , macroeconomics
The objectives of this study were: (1) to investigate the age-related differences in cognitive function (CF), nutritional status (MNA), physical activity (AF), quality of life (QoL), depression, social sat- isfaction (SS) and socioeconomic status (SES), and (2) to explore the relationships between CF and the previous variables. This cross sectional study included 268 men and 433 women (aged 71.4 ± 7.0 years). CF was determined with the Cognitive Telephone Screening Instrument (COGTEL) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Correlates were as follows: Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), PA (Baecke questionnaire modified for older adults), Quality of life (QoL SF- 12), Geriatrics Depression Scale (GDS), Satisfaction and Social Support Scale, and Socioeconomic status (SES). All instruments were applied in a face to face interview. An independent t-test identi- fied significantly higher scores in young-old adults (≤ 69 years) for CF (p < 0.001), PA (p = 0.046) and SES (p = 0.007), compared to old-old adults (≥ 70 years). The results of multiple linear regression analysis indicated that the most significant CF correlates were SES (β = 0.45; p < 0.001), age (β = -0.12; p < 0.001), SS (β = 0.12; p = 0.001), GDS (β = -0.11; p = 0.003) and QoL (β = 0.08; p = 0.017). The overall regression model explained 36% of the total variance in the COGTEL. The oldest and the more depressed adults obtained lower scores for FC. The present study suggests that, between the correlates studied, SES was the strongest predictor in the explanation of CF in older adults.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom