Premium
The Effects of a Multifaceted Intervention to Improve Care Transitions Within an Accountable Care Organization: Results of a Stepped‐Wedge Cluster‐Randomized Trial
Author(s) -
Schnipper Jeffrey L,
Samal Lipika,
Nolido Nyryan,
Yoon Catherine,
Dalal Anuj K,
MagnyNormilus Cherlie,
Bitton Asaf,
Thompson Ryan,
Labonville Stephanie,
Crevensten Gwen
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of hospital medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.128
H-Index - 65
eISSN - 1553-5606
pISSN - 1553-5592
DOI - 10.12788/jhm.3513
Subject(s) - medicine , adverse effect , emergency medicine , psychological intervention , randomized controlled trial , hospital medicine , ambulatory care , medline , intervention (counseling) , patient safety , health care , family medicine , nursing , political science , law , economics , economic growth
BACKGROUND Transitions from hospital to the ambulatory setting are high risk for patients in terms of adverse events, poor clinical outcomes, and readmission. OBJECTIVES To develop, implement, and refine a multifaceted care transitions intervention and evaluate its effects on postdischarge adverse events. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Two‐arm, single‐blind (blinded outcomes assessor), stepped‐wedge, cluster‐randomized clinical trial. Participants were 1,679 adult patients who belonged to one of 17 primary care practices and were admitted to a medical or surgical service at either of two participating hospitals within a pioneer accountable care organization (ACO). INTERVENTIONS Multicomponent intervention in the 30 days following hospitalization, including inpatient pharmacist‐led medication reconciliation, coordination of care between an inpatient “discharge advocate” and a primary care “responsible outpatient clinician,” postdischarge phone calls, and postdischarge primary care visit. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was rate of postdischarge adverse events, as assessed by a 30‐day postdischarge phone call and medical record review and adjudicated by two blinded physician reviewers. Secondary outcomes included preventable adverse events, new or worsening symptoms after discharge, and 30‐day nonelective hospital readmission. RESULTS Among patients included in the study, 692 were assigned to usual care and 987 to the intervention. Patients in the intervention arm had a 45% relative reduction in postdischarge adverse events (18 vs 23 events per 100 patients; adjusted incidence rate ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.35‐0.84). Significant reductions were also seen in preventable adverse events and in new or worsening symptoms, but there was no difference in readmission rates. CONCLUSION A multifaceted intervention was associated with a significant reduction in postdischarge adverse events but no difference in 30‐day readmission rates.