Premium
Hospital Ward Adaptation During the COVID‐19 Pandemic: A National Survey of Academic Medical Centers
Author(s) -
Auerbach Andrew,
O'Leary Kevin J,
Greysen S Ryan,
Harrison James D,
Kripalani Sunil,
Ruhnke Gregory W,
Vasilevskis Eduard E,
Maselli Judith,
Fang Margaret C,
Herzig Shoshana J,
Lee Tiffany,
Schnipper Jeffrey,
Group for the HOMERuN COVID Collaborative
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of hospital medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.128
H-Index - 65
eISSN - 1553-5606
pISSN - 1553-5592
DOI - 10.12788/jhm.3476
Subject(s) - medicine , pandemic , covid-19 , personal protective equipment , isolation (microbiology) , intensive care unit , emergency medicine , hospital medicine , cross sectional study , medline , intensive care , medical emergency , family medicine , intensive care medicine , disease , infectious disease (medical specialty) , outbreak , pathology , virology , political science , law , microbiology and biotechnology , biology
IMPORTANCE Although intensive care unit (ICU) adaptations to the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic have received substantial attention, most patients hospitalized with COVID‐19 have been in general medical units. OBJECTIVE To characterize inpatient adaptations to care for non‐ICU COVID‐19 patients. DESIGN Cross‐sectional survey. SETTING A network of 72 hospital medicine groups at US academic centers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES COVID‐19 testing, approaches to personal protective equipment (PPE), and features of respiratory isolation units (RIUs). RESULTS Fifty‐one of 72 sites responded (71%) between April 3 and April 5, 2020. At the time of our survey, only 15 (30%) reported COVID‐19 test results being available in less than 6 hours. Half of sites with PPE data available reported PPE stockpiles of 2 weeks or less. Nearly all sites (90%) reported implementation of RIUs. RIUs primarily utilized attending physicians, with few incorporating residents and none incorporating students. Isolation and room‐entry policies focused on grouping care activities and utilizing technology (such as video visits) to communicate with and evaluate patients. The vast majority of sites reported decreases in frequency of in‐room encounters across provider or team types. Forty‐six percent of respondents reported initially unrecognized non–COVID‐19 diagnoses in patients admitted for COVID‐19 evaluation; a similar number reported delayed identification of COVID‐19 in patients admitted for other reasons. CONCLUSION The COVID‐19 pandemic has required medical wards to rapidly adapt with expanding use of RIUs and use of technology emerging as critical approaches. Reports of unrecognized or delayed diagnoses highlight how such adaptations may produce potential adverse effects on care.