Premium
Evaluating Automated Rules for Rapid Response System Alarm Triggers in Medical and Surgical Patients
Author(s) -
RomeroBrufau Santiago,
Morlan Bruce W.,
Johnson Matthew,
Hickman Joel,
Kirkland Lisa L.,
Naessens James M.,
Huddleston Jeanne
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of hospital medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.128
H-Index - 65
eISSN - 1553-5606
pISSN - 1553-5592
DOI - 10.12788/jhm.2712
Subject(s) - medicine , odds ratio , hematocrit , hazard ratio , confidence interval , incidence (geometry) , anemia , emergency medicine , physics , optics
BACKGROUND The use of rapid response systems (RRS), which were designed to bring clinicians with critical care expertise to the bedside to prevent unnecessary deaths, has increased. RRS rely on accurate detection of acute deterioration events. Early warning scores (EWS) have been used for this purpose but were developed using heterogeneous populations. Predictive performance may differ in medical vs surgical patients. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the performance of published EWS in medical vs surgical patient populations. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Two tertiary care academic medical center hospitals in the Midwest totaling more than 1500 beds. PATIENTS All patients discharged from January to December 2011. INTERVENTION None. MEASUREMENTS Time‐stamped longitudinal database of patient variables and outcomes, categorized as surgical or medical. Outcomes included unscheduled transfers to the intensive care unit, activation of the RRS, and calls for cardiorespiratory resuscitation (“resuscitation call”). The EWS were calculated and updated with every new patient variable entry over time. Scores were considered accurate if they predicted an outcome in the following 24 hours. RESULTS All EWS demonstrated higher performance within the medical population as compared to surgical: higher positive predictive value ( P < .0001 for all scores) and sensitivity ( P < .0001 for all scores). All EWS had positive predictive values below 25%. CONCLUSIONS The overall poor performance of the evaluated EWS was marginally better in medical patients when compared to surgical patients.