Researching Lean: Methodological Implications of Loose Definitions
Author(s) -
Mikael Brännmark,
Jostein Langstrand,
Stina Johansson,
Agneta Halvarsson,
Lena Abrahamsson,
Jörgen Winkel
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
quality innovation prosperity
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.273
H-Index - 13
eISSN - 1338-984X
pISSN - 1335-1745
DOI - 10.12776/qip.v16i2.67
Subject(s) - operationalization , lean manufacturing , lean project management , process management , lean software development , human performance technology , psychological intervention , business , knowledge management , computer science , psychology , epistemology , marketing , philosophy , software construction , software , psychiatry , software system , programming language
Recently, Lean Production (Lean) has become a prevailing management concept in Sweden. However, previous research seems to show that the Lean concept and the impact of Lean vary considerably between organizations. This paper illustrates some key methodological issues that need to be considered when researching loosely defined management concepts such as Lean. The paper is based on a review of the literature and five comparative Swedish cases studies. Our study indicates that Lean has changed over time and that operationalization and interpretations of the concept vary considerably. This study concludes that future Lean studies should include a thorough assessment of the Lean interventions, study settings, and in particular non-Lean factors mediating the outcomes of Lean-inspired change programs.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom