z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
David Hume: czy ekonomia może być nauką?
Author(s) -
Paweł Hanczewski
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
studia z historii filozofii
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2391-775X
pISSN - 2083-1978
DOI - 10.12775/szhf.2016.063
Subject(s) - character (mathematics) , perspective (graphical) , politics , epistemology , positive economics , economic science , philosophy , economics , sociology , political science , social science , law , art , mathematics , geometry , visual arts
The title of this article refers to one of the best-known essays written by David Hume, That Politics may be reduced to a Science . Hume assumed that politics was a science because it admitted of some general truths, which could not be varied by human beings. He adopted a similar stance, albeit indirectly, in the case of economics, discovering several general truths concerning the origins of wealth, money and international trade. At times, however, he was far from being consistent and this undermined these truths. Consequently, it can be argued that, from his perspective, economics was a science on a theoretical level, but it lost this character at a more practical level. Similar doubts can be raised when it comes to Hume’s role in the history of economic thought. In some respects he was an original thinker, but several of his key concepts resembled to some extent ideas that had been put forward by ‘mercantilists’, especially those ‘mercantilists’ who were active in his native Scotland in the first decade of the 18 th century.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom