Legal indeterminacy – nieokreśloność prawa w doktrynie amerykańskiej
Author(s) -
Natalia Karczewska
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
studia iuridica toruniensia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2391-7873
pISSN - 1689-5258
DOI - 10.12775/sit.2013.005
Subject(s) - indeterminacy (philosophy) , doctrine , indeterminate , law , philosophy , legal realism , argument (complex analysis) , critical legal studies , legal doctrine , epistemology , political science , mathematics , legal profession , pure mathematics , biochemistry , chemistry
This article concerns the issue of legal indeterminacy in American doctrine. Legal indeterminacy in simple words means that law does not always determine the answear to a legal question.It has its origins in the 1920s and 30s, when the argument that Anglo-American law is indeterminate was developed by the legal realists. In the 1980s a new group of legal academics, known as ? Crits ? (from Critical Legal Studies) revived and unfold this thesis. Although today it is regarded as pass e , it seems that not all Crits ? arguments are insubstantial. The author of this article provides basic information about the thesis of legal indeterminacy, its development and kinds (radical indeterminacy, underdeterminacy), explain the relation between uncertainty and indeterminacy, and give some examples. Normal 0 21 false false false PL X-NONE X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:Standardowy; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:justify; line-height:150%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom