English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This is an evaluation of safety climate in health institutions regarding the dimensions of management and healthcare staff from the perspective of intern students in the Faculty of Health Sciences. This study was implemented using the random-sampling method on 204 students who were interns at Selcuk University’s Faculty of Health Sciences. Of the 204 given questionnaires, only 200 of these were included in the study. Participants were first asked to provide their demographic information. Afterwards the scale of So, Fang, and Lingard, developed for safetyclimate measurements and then adapted into Turkish, was given to the participants. There were 14 questions on the evaluation of health and safety relating to healthcare staff. These questions used the 5-point Likert scale (strongly disagree = 1 disagree = 2, neutral = 3 agree = 4, strongly agree = 5). For this study, the reliability of the scale tested at 95% using the SPSS 20.0 program package. According to reliability analysis for management, Cronbach’s Alpha reliability coefficient was .88; for healthcare staff, safety climate’s Cronbach Alpha was .76%. The Cronbach Alpha for the scale’s general reliability was calculated at .89%. A significant difference was found between gender and general safety climate scores (p .05). The participants mainly expressed their thoughts on safety climate perception as “unsure.” When general safety climate perception was evaluated, a significant difference was observed (p < .05). While nursing interns had negative attitudes regarding safety climate, students from the Departments of Health Management, Social Services, and Midwifery showed unsure attitudes. The vast majority of the participants who were surveyed in the security climate questionnaire were “unsure” about the perception of safety climate.

An Evaluation of Safety Climate in Health Institutions from the Perspective of Intern Students in the Faculty of Health Sciences