
Large-Scale Blasts Seismic Load on Natural and Technical Objects
Author(s) -
Сясько,
A. A. Syasko,
Гриб,
Г. В. Гриб,
Гриб,
Н. Н. Гриб,
Качаев,
A.V. Kachaev
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
bezopasnostʹ v tehnosfere
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 1998-071X
DOI - 10.12737/11331
Subject(s) - vibration , scale (ratio) , seismology , natural (archaeology) , seismic loading , seismic wave , natural frequency , structural engineering , geology , engineering , physics , acoustics , paleontology , quantum mechanics
Seismic safety of large-scale blasts is one of the most important geoecological aspects of open-cut mining. Seismic load of largescale
blasts which defines integrity of industrial and residential objects is of special interest. The work represents evaluation of
negative seismic impact of large-scale blasts at «Neryungrinskiy» open-cut on the natural and technical systems located in the
blasting zone. The main characteristic of evaluated seismic load of explosion wave damaging natural and technical constructions
is the maximal value of vectorial velocity of earth movement during large-scale blasts. Determination of permissible speed
fluctuation included its frequency content, as waves of different frequency with equal values of drift velocity are dangerous to
various extents. Peculiarities of vibrational frequency of the constructions caused by seismic load of the blasts and self-induced
vibrations were taken into account while evaluating seismic load. Considering spectral content of the vibrations caused by the
blasts and self-induced vibrations values of gas containers and constructions of compressor station, it’s necessary to point out
that the frequencies differ for 1,5—2 times and this is the favourable factor because of impossibility of resonant phenomena
occurrence. Determination of permissible velocity included swinging of the building. Swinging is understood as ratio of maximal
shift of the measured at the top points of the constructions to maximal shift of the foundation ground. According to the results of
direct measurement, swinging does not exceed 1,5 times that’s why it is possible to found on prevailing values of ratios, calculated
by means of experimental way as statistically explained. The permissible velocity should be accepted as Uperm — 1,25 cm/s. for
the objects. By “swing” we understand the correlation of maximum offset measured on top of construction to maximum offset of
subfoundation. According to direct measurements offset rate stays below 1,5, therefore we can rely on prevailing experimentally
obtained value of correlations and set allowable speed to Ual = 1,25 sm/s.