Comparison of the FASD 4-Digit Code and Hoyme et al. 2016 FASD diagnostic guidelines | Zendy

Susan J. Astley | Zendy; Julia M Bledsoe | Zendy; Julian K Davies | Zendy; John C. Thorne | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Comparison of the FASD 4-Digit Code and Hoyme et al. 2016 FASD diagnostic guidelines

Author(s) -

Susan J. Astley,

Julia M Bledsoe,

Julian K Davies,

John C. Thorne

Publication year - 2017

Publication title -

advances in pediatric research

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

ISSN - 2385-4529

DOI - 10.12715/apr.2017.4.13

Subject(s) - fetal alcohol spectrum disorder , concordance , numerical digit , medicine , fetal alcohol syndrome , medical diagnosis , diagnosis code , pediatrics , population , alcohol , pathology , pregnancy , arithmetic , environmental health , biochemistry , chemistry , genetics , mathematics , biology

As clinicians strive to achieve consensus worldwide on how best to diagnose fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD), the most recent FASD diagnosstic systems exhibit convergence and divergence. Applying these systems to a single clinical population illustrates contrasts between them, but validation studies are ultimately required to identify the best system. Currently, only the 4-Digit Code has published comprehensive validation studies.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research