The construction non-prefixed verb + spatial adverb in Latvian
Author(s) -
Andra Kalnača
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
eesti ja soome-ugri keeleteaduse ajakiri journal of estonian and finno-ugric linguistics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.142
H-Index - 5
eISSN - 2228-1339
pISSN - 1736-8987
DOI - 10.12697/jeful.2017.8.1.05
Subject(s) - adverb , verb , linguistics , latvian , adverbial , verb phrase ellipsis , infinitive , verb phrase , mathematics , modal verb , computer science , noun , philosophy , noun phrase
The status of constructions of the type non-prefixed verb + adverb with regard to expressing aspectuality ( iet ieksā ‘to go in’, vērt vaļā ‘to open up’ etc.) is one of the most interesting problems in Latvian aspectology. However, too little attention has been paid in Latvian linguistics to the use of such constructions in sentences, as well as to the lexical (spatial) meanings of adverbs and their syntactic functions. This study aims to fill that gap, taking a closer look at the ways in which constructions of the type non-prefixed verb + adverb are used in sentences, as well as at the semantics of adverbs and their role in expressing verbal aspect. Whether a verb tends to bind with an adverbial modifier of place (a spatial adverb) when used in actual sentences is determined by verb semantics, resp. telicity, and does not have any direct bearing on the imperfective vs. perfective aspect of the verb or vice versa. Besides, adverbs are non-obligatory. The main conclusion of this study then is that the concept ‘construction of the type non-prefixed verb + adverb ’ should be used with extreme caution with regard to verb–adverb bindings in sentences. It can, perhaps, be applied, in a very broad sense, to verbs of motion (and other telic verbs), but not to the use of all Latvian verbs in general. Kokkuvote. Andra Kalnaca: Konstruktsioon prefiksita verb + kohamaarsona lati keeles . Uks lati keele aspektoloogia huvitavamaid kusimusi on konstruktsioonide prefiksita verb + adverb staatus aspekti valjendamisel (nt iet ieksā ‘sisse minema’, celt pāri ‘ule tostma’). Siiski pole lati keeleteaduses pooratud piisavalt tahelepanu selle konstruktsiooni kasutamisele lauses ega adverbi leksikaalsele, s.o lokaalsele tahendusele ja suntaktilistele funktsioonidele. Tahtis on rohutada, et lokaalse tahendusega adverbi lausesse liitmise tingib verbi semantika, s.o teelisus. Verbi imperfektiivsusel/perfektiivsusel pole sellega otsest seost, vrd skriet prom – aizskriet prom ‘minema jooksma’. Sealjuures pole adverbi kasutamine koos verbiga kohustuslik; samuti voib adverb liituda prefiksiga verbile. Selleparast tuleb moistet “konstruktsioon prefiksita verb + kohamaarsona ” kasutada vaga ettevaatlikult, kui juttu on verbi ja adverbi liitumisest lauses. Uldjoontes voib seda moistet kasutada liikumis verbide (ja teiste teeliste verbide) kohta, aga mitte koigi lati keele verbide kohta, sest lati keele verbide ja adverbide kasutamine lauses ei ole grammatiseerunud ei konstruktsioonide ega eraldiseisvate vormidena. Marksonad : verbi aspekt; teelisus; adverb; liikumisverb; prefiksita/prefiksiga verb
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom