z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Investigation of the Air Kerma Response of Spherical Ionization Chambers for Unfolded Pulse Height Distributions of 60Co and 137Cs using the EGS4 Monte Carlo Code
Author(s) -
Kook Jin Chun,
Gwang Ho YOO
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
journal of radiation research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.643
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 1349-9157
pISSN - 0449-3060
DOI - 10.1269/jrr.07003
Subject(s) - kerma , monte carlo method , extrapolation , ionization , atomic physics , ionization chamber , stopping power , materials science , physics , dosimetry , computational physics , nuclear physics , analytical chemistry (journal) , nuclear medicine , chemistry , ion , statistics , mathematics , medicine , chromatography , quantum mechanics
Data required for the determination of the absolute air kerma rate for (60)Co and (137)Cs gamma-rays using spherical cavity chambers were calculated using the EGS4 Monte Carlo system. Mass energy-absorption coefficient ratio and the stopping power ratio were calculated for a 10 cm(3) primary standard graphite-walled ionization chamber from the unfolded energy pulse height distributions of (60)Co and (137)Cs sources. Wall correction factors and non-uniformity correction factors for two graphite and one air equivalent plastic walled ionization chambers were also calculated with EGS4 code. The wall correction factors were compared with those determined by an experimental extrapolation method. To check the accuracy of the calculations the results were compared with those obtained from other primary standard laboratories such as NIST and NRCC. For a 10 cm(3) graphite ionization chamber, the mass energy-absorption coefficient ratios were 0.99917 for (60)Co and 1.0004 for (137)Cs. The values differed by 0.02-0.05 % for (60)Co and 0.11 % for (137)Cs from those of two laboratories. The stopping power ratios were 0.99984 for (60)Co and 1.0087 for (137)Cs. Comparison with NIST values showed differences of 0.06 % for (60)Co and 0.04 % for (137)Cs. The wall correction factors were obtained and they were different by 0.6-1.1 % for (60)Co and (137)Cs compared to the experimental linear extrapolation method. These values were compared with Monte Carlo derived values from other laboratories. The non-uniformity correction factors were also calculated and they differed from unity, the traditional value used in most standard national metrology laboratories.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom