A comparative case study of bowel cancer screening in the UK and Australia: Evidence lost in translation? | Zendy

Kathy Flitcroft | Zendy; David John | Zendy; Kirsten Howard | Zendy; Stacy M. Carter | Zendy; Michael Pig | Zendy; Glenn Salkeld | Zendy; Lyndal Trevena | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

A comparative case study of bowel cancer screening in the UK and Australia: Evidence lost in translation?

Author(s) -

Kathy Flitcroft,

David John,

Kirsten Howard,

Stacy M. Carter,

Michael Pig,

Glenn Salkeld,

Lyndal Trevena

Publication year - 2011

Publication title -

journal of medical screening

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.515

H-Index - 64

eISSN - 1475-5793

pISSN - 0969-1413

DOI - 10.1258/jms.2011.011066

Subject(s) - medicine , jurisdiction , compromise , population , colonoscopy , quality (philosophy) , welsh , family medicine , actuarial science , environmental health , colorectal cancer , cancer , business , political science , geography , philosophy , archaeology , epistemology , law

(i) To document the current state of the English, Scottish, Welsh, Northern Irish and Australian bowel cancer screening programmes, according to seven key characteristics, and (ii) to explore the policy trade-offs resulting from inadequate funding.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research